CLUSTER / THE DECISION MAP
Non-EU, UK, US and international comparisons.
Territorial reach, third-country providers, and jurisdiction-labelled comparisons with the UK, the US and international work.
IN THIS CLUSTER
12 guides.
How does the AI Act reach beyond the EU, and how do other jurisdictions compare?
An overview of territorial reach, third country providers, the UK, US and EEA positions, and the limits of international comparisons.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEWhat is the territorial reach of the AI Act in Article 2?
Article 2(1) scope, placing on the market, putting into service, output use in the Union, and the exclusions and limits that must be checked in the consolidated text.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEDoes the UK have an AI Act equivalent?
The UK position as checked on 29 October 2026: no standalone AI statute, sector regulators, five policy principles, and the October 2025 Blueprint and AI Growth Lab proposals.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEHow do UK sector regulators apply AI rules?
UK sector regulators for AI: ICO, FCA, MHRA, Ofcom, CMA and EHRC, their remits, their guidance, and the need to check each regulator for the sector concerned.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEWhat is the US federal position on AI regulation?
The US federal position as checked on 29 October 2026: no federal AI statute, sector regulation, voluntary frameworks including NIST, and executive action that must be checked on official sources.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEHow do US state AI laws differ from each other?
US state AI laws in outline, with Colorado as the first comprehensive example, the need to check each state on official legislature sources, and the fast moving position that must be rechecked.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEDoes the AI Act apply in Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein?
The EEA and EFTA position in outline: incorporation into the EEA Agreement, Joint Committee Decisions, national implementation, and the developing and unverified position as checked on 29 October 2026.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEWhat must third country providers do about authorised representatives?
Authorised representatives for high risk AI systems under Article 22 and for general purpose models under Article 54, mandates, duties and the limits of the role.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEWhat is the output used in the Union test?
Article 2(1)(c) for third country providers and deployers, what counts as output use in the Union, and the evidence needed to apply the test.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEHow does AI Act scope compare with UK and US scope?
A scope comparison across the EU, UK and US that states what it does not compare, with jurisdiction labelled analysis and checking instructions for each jurisdiction.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEHow do risk approaches and enforcement compare across the EU, UK and US?
A comparison of risk approaches and enforcement in the EU, UK and US, stating what it does not compare, with jurisdiction labelled analysis and checking instructions.
Read guide ↗CLUSTER ARTICLEWhich international standards bodies work on AI?
ISO, IEC, IEEE, NIST and CEN-CENELEC in outline, the relationship between international and European standards, and the limits of standards as legal compliance routes.
Read guide ↗